By Jeff Chiacchieri/fedupjeff
I am a citizen who supports the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA). On July 8 a federal district court judge in Massachusetts ruled DOMA unconstitutional. This was a step backward in the struggle to maintain society’s moral foundation. More representatives need to be proactive and co-sponsor H.Res.1607 due to the far-reaching aspects of the homosexual agenda. This article thoroughly explains non-typical facts why our representatives need to take action. Text of H. Res.1607: http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=hr111-1607
Americas religious base is not protecting her moral foundation from vicious & subversive ideologies that are sabotaging our cultural, fiscal, political & judicial systems from within our government. My goal is to expose this cultural & delusional elitism in an effort to wake up citizens. This can be stopped by congress through an aware populous, and silence is interpreted throughout our delusional government as public acceptance of liberal extremism! The issues presented here are nothing but the truth. The main stream media, liberal "log cabin" republicans, Obama, and appointed cronies only respond to this reality with subversive unconstitutional attacks against the citizens who step up, speak out, and try to restore America. Our most decadent liberals & republicrats are fueling this corrupt & perverse utopia! I had to write my representatives, after reading this hopefully you will?
I am in no way aligned with any radical agendas. I am writing about the valid reasons how the gay movement can, how it already is, and how it can be handled to not cause harm to/in society. Herein I will explain several issues: How evolutionary liberal PhD ideology is being used to promote psychology that is used to justify the gay agenda, and in itself represents subversive and psychologically impaired pseudoscience. How and why Proponents of prop 8 have standing. The common sense reasons why prop 8 should remain in effect after a federal judge found it unconstitutional. How the far-reaching aspects of the homosexual agenda is a threat and already causing harm in society. Why the word "marriage" is so important for the purpose of the homosexual movement. How redefining that word is the doorway into the most far-reaching aspects of the agenda. How the homosexual movement in itself represents discrimination! How we recognize marriage in itself as a civil right, but need to also recognize how the homosexual movement is using marriage for something else in the name of civil rights, and how that threatens society, its moral foundation, and democracy! And most importantly, for citizens, congress, and the supreme court to acknowledge these issues as "legislative facts" to help everyone question how far are we willing to allow this gay test in a few states to continue, because presented here is plenty of reasons/evidence to show it is causing harm with the objective of forcing a redefining of society’s moral foundation. I want to warn you that much of the references/evidence here on links to back up my claims, when read has left everyone I know extremely upset, like they want to throw up, some in tears, some in shock, and all get very angry.
Several years ago Massachusetts legalized same sex marriage and homosexuals went to Massachusetts to get married just to go back to their states and file for divorce. That’s because gay marriage is not about marriage or civil rights. It is about redefining society to replace our moral foundation to embrace homosexuality from a distorted perspective. Judge Walker is apparently confident/arrogant enough to think his interpretative court activism will change the federal judiciary’s approach to statutory interpretation. Here is a recent gay couple from Massachusetts trying to get divorced in Texas.
The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals had to grant an indefinite stay in the Prop 8 case because Judge Walker chose to ignore precedence and through judicial supremacy ruled same sex options to be more important than traditional ones, by ruling same sex relationships deserve the same rights and responsibilities as traditional marriages. That last part of the statement sounds fair until one starts digging deeper into this ruling. It took 136 pages for Walker, with the help of a few hand picked intellectuals, to arrogantly portray the majority and their representatives in this country as too ignorant to have any part in defining marriage. Homosexuals claim there is no reliable evidence that same-sex marriage is harmful to children, or that it is a threat to social stability, and due to that claim they are demanding that the courts redefine social norms, because they are suffering from the current ones. Addressing this in the way the homosexual activists demand causes harm and suffering to heterosexuals! Marriage is only phase 1 of the gay agenda, and the agenda is in itself, irrational, immoral and unconstitutionally discriminatory to heterosexuals.
There is only one valid argument acceptable by the heterosexual majority in this country, and that is to allow gays to get economic benefits from the government traditionally granted to married couples,…by the government. Now there are no other “acceptable” benefits afforded homosexuals by redefining traditional marriage, morality and societies moral foundation.
Judge Walker and gay activists want to plant in my mind gay marriage is equal to things like the abolition of slavery, or women overcoming patriarchy! Well that just gives the gay side a false sense of credibility by exploiting those past struggles. Furthermore, I am insulted by the racist attitude of Judge Walker that claims I don’t know any better. Gay activists are showing there true colors to label my concerns as irrational! They claim anyone who opposes their view are bigots or homophobes! They think that helps justify their actions, but it's clearly not reality. What is Judge Walkers 136 page reasoning? Logic would dictate Judge walker now believes it’s gays right because some carefully selected PhD’s conclude evolutionary psychology, due to existence of homosexuality, is a better alternative to a Constitution? OMG! One activist, who is also a judge, knows better about all things moral and political! Well if that is the case Mr. Walker you are truly in the best position possible for a gay activist, but as a judge, are also so wrong. How dare you marginalize all opponents to your point of view! Its blatantly obvious your actions as a judge show only homosexual ideas of moral guidelines are of importance to you.
It’s obvious the hired professionals/intellectuals for the religious or gay side behave in a way that shows they only care about factors recognized by the cause they are working for, and the resulting intellectual ideology established, dismissing any factors not controllable and recognized by the extremist agendas. That leads me to the fact these people, due to conflicts of interest, are not acting intelligently, they are acting stupid, selfish, or narrow minded, making them just salespeople of the most far-reaching aspects of especially, the homosexual agenda. Now that is what exposes the close mindedness and racist attitude of that agenda.
The reason the heterosexual majority has had enough is because our societies moral guidelines have already been compromised/pushed to a questionable limit, and it was a minority that has pushed that agenda on everyone else. Here we go again, using lots of money…using a good law firm…using an activist judge who has "lost sight" of the ethical limitations of the court. For the government to take full responsibility and embrace every right the homosexual movement demands, it would have to take into consideration the reality of each individual homosexuals feelings by addressing the enormity of the extent to which today’s society erodes their capacity to feel normal/accepted. Given that reality, it explains the following: During these debates I have had with gay activists online, I have been told, on more than one occasion, “that based on my stance and the issues I raise, it is obvious Jeff, you are blatantly homophobic, and that is associated with homosexual arousal that you are denying, its been proven, so don’t be afraid, its normal” Well my first reaction was, HAHAHAHAHA! This explains why I cannot have a rational conversation with homosexual active extremists. I am not laughing anymore because the deeper I look into this agenda the more I realize how sinister it is becoming. The study they are using is from the Journal of Abnormal Psychology and it is apparent the homosexual activists are even redefining homophobia to fit into their agenda. The study concludes “Homophobia is apparently associated with homosexual arousal that the homophobic individual is either unaware of or denies“ http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8772014
That explains the twisted justification they use to force this on all heterosexuals, and even more disturbingly onto their children, against their will! 98.4% of Conservatives & 91.6% of Liberals want to protect the historic sense of parental rights. That is sending a clear message! http://bit.ly/as09Cx
No one thinking rationally can think unlimited redefining of societies moral guidelines, so the homosexuals feel better about their life, is the best solution to this! Follow the logic….where would it end?
Really where will it end? A line must be drawn! That trend, enshrined as a rights issue, has led us to the present far-reaching part of the homosexual agenda which is subversive not only of morality, but of social order. It is now blatantly obvious homosexual activists are not simply consenting adults doing no harm behind closed doors, but intent on enshrining their practices as rights above everyone else in society.
Combining homosexual life styles to redefine societal norms, to redefine the important values regarding men and woman in child-rearing, to redefine what is harmful regarding the majorities moral guidelines, and to redefine the value of traditional marriage is in no way within the judiciaries subject matter jurisdiction. That’s why we had such a one sided 136 page trial. The public deserves better, and will get it from the supreme court! 99% of all debates I have had with gays on websites refuse to acknowledge the far-reaching agenda I am so concerned with. No matter how well informed my questions and examples are, no matter how complex an understanding they were based on, In the end the most popular names I have been called are; bigot, homophobe, religious, nazi, moron, racist, fear mongerer, and clever hater. No matter how loud their rhetoric gets, I will not shut up and accept redefining marriage and morality. I will not put my morals and culture aside and openly accept the stage set for an anything goes society and not see the legal, cultural, and political consequences to follow this precedent. After marriage is conquered, the activists would not shut up, because redefining marriage is just the doorway into the far-reaching agenda to redefine.
Like many Americans, I am completely disinterested in other "adults" sexual behavior. If two people of the same sex want to love each other I DON'T CARE. I would venture to say its not the average Joe blow homosexual that is obsessed with redefining marriage…it’s the activist extremists!
To communicate or debate, one has to decide what their issue is with prop 8, gay marriage or judicial activism to redefine social norms?.
According to judge walker the current "credible" motivation for banning gays and lesbians from marrying is a desire to mark them as second-class citizens. No Judge Walker, the “credible” motivation is to stop the activists far-reaching agenda! You will not change societal norms to conform to your agenda, or the ancient traditional foundation that exists.
Do non-activist gays really think a piece of paper will change anything? Well for me I found that kind of ownership of another person just makes life more complicated. Well as a born catholic, now divorced single father, its easy for me to feel that way emotionally. Also, you never heard me complain with my choice to become a minority as a single dad back in the 1990s with custody of my kids. I was discriminated across the board compared to single moms, so I have some personal experience with discrimination.
I wish this country could be up in arms working together over something sooooo much more important then trivial gay marriage in itself, when its actually something they don’t even see. The redefining of societal values to fuel a perverse homosexual agenda. What about decades of sloppy capitalism, and all its trickle down effects that has our country in such a terrible economic mess! Hopefully before its too late the populous will wake up collectively and look what’s happening to our country?...and look where we are at? Shouldn’t there be hundreds of other more relevant issues to get this country up in arms? Perhaps when this issue is exposed for what it really is it will open eyes and minds, so they can help their representatives help them, as I am doing now!
Now if the issue for anyone is solely gay marriage, weather for or against it, then they are talking about their own life/emotions, and regardless if this decision is in their favor or not, that blinds them. That’s what the populous does! That must frustrate all you in congress whom created DOMA for the heterosexual majority?
There is an issue here bigger than, beliefs, religion, homophobia, sin, or gay marriage, all of that is just the stage. My interest here is what is going on behind this gay smokescreen? What’s that? It’s the constitution being manipulated to fit a judicial agenda to change society for people in the populous like themselves. Well, constitutional interpretation or reconstructing the constitution for gays certainly will not be left to unrestricted judicial activism!
I am sure the majority in this country, if its put in there face to hear and see the truth about the gay agenda, would not sit back and concur with Judicial inability to recognize its limitations as a political entity, arrogantly undermining democratic favor.
Society cannot separate due to physical traits. It does separate based on things that society deems immoral or dangerous. If this is discrimination which side or who defines morality?, defines what is harmful?, defines an individuals moral guidelines?, defines homophobia? Each side has different definitions. As I stated above, I have been repeatedly referred to by gay activists as a homophobe, only on the basis for expressing the issues raised here.
Why is that?
They claim their opinion is fact rooted in science, dismissing everything I say as fear mongering.
I claim their facts are nonsense rooted in the distorted pseudoscience of evolutionary psychology!
So who decides which sides opinions are the facts to lead society? So, as a result of this, many on both sides of the issues are condescending and belittling the other, what a waste of time. To communicate or debate our words need to have the same meaning or were not speaking the same language and we get nowhere, for example look at the abortion debate.
How far do gay activists think the supreme court will break down the majority of citizens conventional ideas of societal norms and morality? Certainly not as far as gay activists envision! We should find an acceptable limit that does not discriminate against society as a whole, by allowing benefits. Will the Supreme court decide for society the definition of correct and moral behavior for all mindsets? No way, because we are still a constitutional representative democracy, yes? Gay activists want the supreme court to rule we as a society are ready to "evolve" into something more radical then we already have, meaning they want to decide for society that we are beyond those old outdated parameters and ready for their vision! Here is some good reading regarding how we evolved to this point. Showing how same sex marriage obviously undermines the institution of marriage.....which is used to undermine society's moral foundation. A real good read to see into the future, because we are today where Scandinavia was in the 1990's.
Here we are today in the USA following the trend in Scandinavia with children born out-of-wedlock steadily increasing http://ht.ly/193dHM
It is obvious liberal cultural elite social science research is inadequate to prove or disprove what effect same sex marriage has on society. Judicial activism, at the state level, void of judicial restraint, is an area of the homosexual agenda that needs to be recognized for the disturbing reality it represents as it matures. It shows a racist form of restraint toward the current moral foundation of the majority the legislature is representing.......by abusing the statutes passed by the legislature......by abusing executive or administrative agencies...... by abusing the meaning of the words in the Constitution, and by abusing the legal precedents established by previous judicial interpretations of the Constitution! Perhaps we are currently living through two battles? One between the Constitution and the judges?, the other, supreme law and the judiciary? We shall see. Activist judges know they have judicial immunity with their statutory interpretations, so Walker knows he is immune from lawsuit and has, as an activist, decided to just go for it. That should be illegal!
Judge Walker says: "the ruling struck down Proposition 8 as a violation of federal constitutional guarantees of equal protection and due process"
So if it’s unconstitutional to prohibit same sex marriage…. Using that same ideology is it even more unconstitutional to force this on all of society? Now, if “moral disapproval” violates constitutional rights as Judge walker stated, then he is contradicting himself? Constitutional politics is known to, and accepted to use, persuasion to initiate change. This Judge has just used political coercion to change the moral guidelines for all.. He has personally, through the court, used the morality of rights from a minority, to displace the morality of consent with all of California.
I would say every time judicial supremacy replaces constitutional supremacy It goes against our best ideals constitutionally, that is regarding the intended understanding of the values outlined in our founding documents, and we alter the constitution without public acceptance and or awareness, true? This supremacy is a slippery slope, and will lead to more problems that are significant if not controlled, to the point where someday we may end up a dictatorship! California has already voted twice that marriage is the union of a man and a woman and approved Prop 8. 30 states have voted the same, over 60 million Americans. I accept the current benchmark of our citizens individual voting preferences to prevent homosexuality from redefining society, do you?
I project that if the supreme court (which will not happen) forces this down society's throat, with all the societal changes that would follow…..for example, heterosexual children being taught that homosexuality, through the science of psychology, forced through the judiciary, with their tax dollars, will redefine their kids moral guidelines, and teach them homosexuality is healthy life choice! What would be the result? That kind of tactic (and it has already started) would prove disastrous for the gay agenda. The current modern acceptance that has taken many years to evolve for accepting homosexuality, by the heterosexual majority in this country, would now be forced backwards due to the homosexuals extremist agenda!
Here is another example: These links show a disturbing reality happening in this country where gay marriage has been legalized. Proving the far-reaching agenda is already underway to redefine social norms & morality, even targeting impressionable minds in school as young as grade 2.
twolives.com Publishes and sell the books for indoctrinating children.
Obama has appointed Kevin Jennings for Safe Schools who is the founder of Gay Lesbian and Straight Education Network (GLSEN) No president or any sane adult would advocate exposing children to this kind of sick pornography. Scroll down when on the link below and read excerpts of pages from several books used by GLSEN. This disgusting and unbelievable gay porn being taught to children in this country must stop!
This disgusting book: The Age Taboo-Gay Male Power, Sexuality, Power, and Consent, contends that sex between men and boys is widely practiced to the joys and benefits of those involved. http://newgon.com/wiki/The_Age_Taboo http://gaybookreviews.info/review/2399/536
Anti bullying is another avenue for the gay front. Anti-bullying legislation and policies are needed to cover a whole host of issues with children. It's wrong to bully anyone, but it's also wrong to indoctrinate someone else's children with cognitive psychology using pro-homosexual materials that stigmatize opponents of homosexual behavior as ugly, bigoted and hateful, under the guise of anti bullying. http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/08/focus_on_the_family_dont_let_gay_activists_hijack.php?ref=fpb
Homosexual activists envision a world where groups like NAMBLA (The North American Man/Boy Love Association) are considered normal! NAMBLA who helped write The Age Taboo, advocates the weakening of laws against sexual relations between adults and minor males. As the homosexual movement evolves, its becoming less about marriage and more about redefining our cultural, fiscal, political & judicial systems. Constitutionally those will become the crucial "legislative facts" proving marriage is only a deceptive doorway to attack society's "moral foundation" and to allow that redefinition would be a much more profound case of judicial activism and abuse of constitution to the populous.
Homosexuals constitutional argument is all are created equal endowed with certain unalienable constitutional rights, and try to twist those rights under the guise of civil rights, violating others civil rights, which is an abuse of civil rights.This is another far-reaching and delusional part of the homosexual agenda that disturbingly needs abused mind-destroyed boys as they get older to support the homosexual agenda, as it matures after marriage is redefined. Can you imagine our evolving Republic following an agenda that normalized pedophilia, enshrined as equal/civil rights under the Constitution, to promote homosexuality, to increase the percentage of homosexuals in society! All this makes me feel sick, like I want to puke! I want to look the other way, but I am writing this to you instead!
http://www.nambla.org/whatis.htm Read the section titled: Who are we?
NAMBLA is on Facebook: http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2010/09/28/pedophiles-find-home-social-networking-facebook/
Just like all the special interest laws that piggy-back on major congressional bills, homosexual hidden objectives have been hitchhiked on our national drive for literacy. Gay Activists need children before they establish their identity, void of impediments for homosexual indoctrination. They are, as an adult, telling children to perceive life from beyond their parents/society's moral guidelines, to not only embrace homosexuality, but to experiment with it! These disgusting objectives are met by infusing classroom studies with pro-homosexual ideology. Those psychological manipulations are designed to clash with traditional values, society's moral foundation, and cause moral confusion in our children . This is done through the venue of allowing and creating confusion in society about what defines correct, wrong, normal and abnormal behavior!
Another message to Obama, Jennings & their indoctrinators:141 congressional co-sponsors for parental rights amendment! http://bit.ly/ntCPt
The stage is being prepared to redefine the role of civic education in shaping how our children become citizens This article shows another disturbing trend where a foundation is being created necessary for redefining society. Whats happening is state-led Common Core initiatives, like civics, is being lost and history is put under English. Liberal extremism cannot move forward and redefine society's moral foundation with traditional English and History being taught to our children. http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/end-history-americas-classrooms_508402.html
It’s a safe bet to say that given the choice between promoting the dumbing down of our children through socialism, liberal extremism, and outright homosexuality.......or more literacy, the majority of parents would choose the latter. We need policies that empower parents, not policies that throw scarce taxpayer resources into homosexual classes, forcing parents to re teach children what they are taught in school, or even keeping them out of school to protect their minds from sick propaganda and indoctrination. We must target homosexuals activists with our awareness. We risk losing the honesty and integrity that once made America safe for children through homosexual propaganda and indoctrination!
Liberal cultural elite social science/psychology is the foundation of this sick and blatantly obvious far-reaching agenda. Its destructive goal is to redefine societies moral guidelines, and will cause “harm” to heterosexuals, children, and proves the proponents of prop 8 have standing. Homosexual activists deny that they want access to boys, while at the same time work to lower the age of sexual consent.using psychiatric and psychological associations, which in recent years have moved toward normalizing and advocating pedophilia, much as they did with homosexuality in the1970s. After a decade of gay marriage in Scandinavia the taboo against sex with children continues to erode. http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/001/329pdstm.asp
There has long been a private world protected by:
- the image of mystical thinking (religion)
- superior intelligence (science/pseudoscience)
- civil rights, that activists abuse/use to justify/hide extremist agendas.
Constitutionally, as our republic evolves, the pursuit of liberty and equal application of the law is supposed to be the goal. Instead we have Obama's blatant racism and it's the lowest form of social discourse and interaction I have ever seen in my life come out of the white house. His ingenious subversive structure sets the stage for gay activists to use institutionalized racism through legal preferences, allowing a redefining of society's moral foundation. It's proving dangerous for America and her citizens to continue to allow an intelligent and educated narcissist in the white House.
Underneath Obama's intellectual smokescreen is a decadent liberal that has now proven he coned his way into the presidency. He stepped into a bad economic and social situation and made it so much worse for America/Americans. As president it is his constitutional duty to protect and preserve America on behalf of Americans, a future about progress in the constitutionally correct direction for America. Obama is obviously and blatantly going in the opposite direction with his delusional world plan. That is treason! Given the enormity of issues threatening society, the economy, traditional values etc, we are at a pivotal point and forced to evolve into more of a thinking society........or we will continue to suffer dire consequences from our elected officials! America is not ruled or protected by a religious belief system. And that is relevant to the way we have evolved, and partially explains why we are where we are today. That is the reason, as a responsible member of society, I am not allowing my own moral guidelines to be dictated by a con artist like Obama, his appointed minions, and any radical social elitists or activist extremists. I pledge, within my means, to protect our moral foundation by exposing liberal cultural elitism. That is why I wrote this and created a Twitter profile for this article Followers not only gives this article a louder voice, but gives me the means to speak out to fellow voters, improving odds against the tactics of corrupt & morally bankrupt politicians.
Acknowledging the issues raised here on a societal level would certainly expose the homosexual activists agenda. Walkers decision was thought by the homosexual movement that their far-reaching agenda was well under way, designed so the Supreme Court would make gay marriage a constitutional right in every state. I want to feel confidant the supreme Court Judges, through their perceptions, anticipated these problems many years ago? I also want to feel confidant they perceive the consequences of the far-reaching homosexual agenda to redefine? Perhaps that could lead to a constitutional amendment that would eliminate same-sex marriage in all states? In the end, under the Constitution, the ruling of the Supreme court should be in line with our founding legal principals, regardless of political pressure applied from homosexual or religious bias, so that decision will reflect a common sense decision, yes? And that decision cannot unilaterally overturn the will of the people for a homosexual or religious cause, correct? Perhaps the decision may be to avoid making a decision at all, and leave it to states?
Here is the way I think things will evolve:
For the homosexual movement to achieve their objective and redefine society's moral foundation a passage of a constitutional amendment is necessary. This requires approval by two-thirds of both the Senate and the House of Representatives, as well as by three-quarters of the state legislatures. And it will be decades before our populous reaches a consensus allowing that amendment. So the policies aimed at resolving this issue will be developed at the state level because issues involving family law have historically fallen under the judgment of the state legislatures and state courts. In this interim awaiting consensus what will end up happening is long-term gay relationships will be recognized as civil unions.
Regardless, I project the gay activists, with their media proponents, will continue “marching” in the same direction spewing rhetoric! And in the years to come, in the name of every heterosexual citizen, no matter how many PhD's create pseudoscience facts for the homosexual cause, they will not force change of moral guidelines on society to support their agenda!
How gay rights has been sold in America:
18% of Americans approve of the job Congress is doing. http://lat.ms/bnQqnZ
Write your Representatives. Speak out, and include this site if you agree with me!
Contact Your Senator
Can we now agree that gay marriage is not about gay marriage? Lets speak out on the gay agenda so we can deal with it, put it behind us, and talk about something more important to preserve this great experiment we call the U.S.A. Here is a good read: http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/27555
Follow on twitter in support to show Congress and the White House you do not accept this extremism that's boundless & subversive to its core! http://twitter.com/fedupjeff I can also be contacted through twitter.